BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA REGULAR MEETING MARCH 26, 1996 The Board of County Commissioners of Leon County, Florida, met in regular session at 5:00 p.m. with Chairman Host presiding. Those in attendance were Commissioners Yordon, Joanos, Davis, Maloy, Kio-Green, and Thaell. Also in attendance were County Attorney Herb Thiele, County Administrator Parwez Alam, Deputy Clerk Bill Bogan, Jr., and Secretary Sandra C. O'Neal. The meeting opened with Invocation provided by Commissioner Davis followed by the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. AWARDS AND PRESENTATIONS A presentation was made to the Planning Department "Acknowledgment of Outstanding Achievement of selling the most tickets of any County Department for the 1996 March of Dimes WalkAmerica". Chairman Host presented a plaque to the Planning Department staff, and the Board congratulated the department on its achievement. CONSENT AGENDA Commissioner Maloy moved, duly seconded by Commissioner Kio- Green and carried unanimously, to approve the Consent Agenda as follows with the exception of items 4 and 5 which were addressed as described: 1. BILLS AND VOUCHERS The Board approved the following County bills and authorized the Chairman and the Clerk to issue the proper warrants: $ 1,017,981.36 2. CONSERVATION EASEMENTS AND PLATS OF RIVERSIDE AT CROOKED ROAD The Board accepted the conservation easements (Malone Peddie, Darleen Peddie, Brad Peddie, and Bill Clark) and directed staff to record them in the public records of Leon County and approve the plats of Riverside at Crooked Road Units 1 and 2 and directed staff to proceed with the recording in the public records of Leon County. 3. RE-PLAT OF LOT 2 OF DAVIDSON SUBDIVISION The Board approved the replat of Lot 2 of Davidson Subdivision and directed staff to proceed with the recording of the plat in the public records of Leon County. (The developers, Michael W. Forsthoefel and Jana M. Bures- Forsthoefel made the request for the replat of the subdivision which is located at the intersection of Audubon Drive and Woodley Road and consists of 14.86 acres divided into six lots.) 4. NON-RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION OF SEGMENT OF NINA ROAD Commissioner Kio-Green pulled this item to suggest that staff follow up on any possibility of purchasing the property prior to development on the site. Planning Department Director Wendy Gray advised that staff was notified by a property owner who indicated that it may be beneficial to acquire this property rather than do the redesignation. Commissioner Kio-Green moved, duly seconded by Commissioner Joanos and carried unanimously, to approve the designation of Nina Road between Blountstown Highway and Pensacola Street as a non-residential street, and that staff look into the possibility of purchasing the property prior to development. 5. CONFIRMATION OF BOARD DIRECTION AT WORKSHOP ON GROWTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SERVICE COST EVALUATION Chairman Host pulled this item to report that he has asked the County Administrator to look at DEP standards and report back to the Board. (It was his understanding that the City is now looking into administering permits on the part of DEP so there are not two permitting agencies.) Commissioner Kio-Green moved, duly seconded by Commissioner Davis and carried unanimously, to approve staff recommendation to confirm the list of seven issues and concerns listed in the analysis to be addressed by staff. (See attached:) 6. REQUEST TO SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE CITY'S PRE- APPLICATION TO OPERATE A WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ON LOVIC ROAD The Board scheduled a public hearing for 6:00 p.m., April 23, 1996 on the City of Tallahassee's pre-application to operate a water distribution system on Lovic Road (south of Oakridge Road, two miles west of Woodville Highway). 7. REQUEST TO SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING TO ADOPT THE HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN FOR THE SHIP PROGRAM The Board scheduled a public hearing for 6:00 p.m. April 9, 1996, to adopt a Housing Assistance Plan for the State Housing Initiatives Partnership (SHIP) Program. 8. JTPA JOBS AND BENEFIT JOINT TRAINING PLAN FOR GADSDEN, LEON AND WAKULLA COUNTIES The Board approved the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) and Jobs and Benefit Joint Job Training Plan for Gadsden, Leon, and Wakulla counties for submittal to the Department of Labor and Employment Security. 9. ADJUSTMENT TO TIMETABLE FOR COUNTY WORKSHOPS The Board adopted the attached timetable for County workshops, with the meetings to conclude at 4:00 p.m. GENERAL BUSINESS 10. WADESBORO ROAD Staff has secured five right-of-way dedications granting Leon County a 60-foot right-of-way for a portion of the Wadesboro Road Paving Project. These right-of-way dedications were presented to the Board on July 11, 1995, and were approved and accepted. County Attorney Thiele explained that the issue is whether or not, in light of objections from certain property owners in the area, the County Public Works should proceed with the project. One of the issues is whether or not the County has right-of-way and sufficient quantity of right-of-way to proceed with the project. Mr. Thiele stated that there are questions raised on this issue but he believes that to a vast majority of the property, there is "color of title," a claim that the County could acquire some of that through either exercise of the County's rights or through a conveyance from original grantor (Judge O'Connell). He explained that this may or may not suffice because of other residents in the area. Mr. Thiele advised that the question before the Board is "whether or not the County, because of the controversy or potential controversy (which could result in litigation), wishes to go forward or cancel the project." One of the methods of resolving it would be to bring declaratory judgment action to determine who owns or has title to the dirt road itself. Chairman Host explained that approximately one year ago, he requested that this item be withdrawn in deference to the property owners who wanted to negotiate with a neighbor across the street and acquire property that would cause the road to be moved into a new location; the car road would act as a buffer. He further explained that apparently there was misunderstanding on the part of the property owners on whether or not they would have to go through a subdivision process among other issues, which appear to have been addressed. Commissioner Host moved that Public Works be directed to proceed as quickly as possible with all necessary planning, and work to accomplish the paving of Wadesboro Road, West, with two provisions: one, that if those who live at the east end of the road are able to acquire the lands at their cost, to move the road northward of their property to satisfy their preferences the location of the road will be moved northward on the acquired lands, and; two, that the width of the contributed right-of-way and construction on the westerly portion may be modified to avoid encroaching too closely on the church and residences located along that portion of the road. Commissioner Thaell seconded the motion. Justice Steven C. O'Connell appeared representing his family who owns three-quarters of a mile on the south side of the road who have given a dedication. He stated that the Bradshaw interest has given a dedication on the north side of the road, and all but one property owner on the south side, westerly end have given a dedication. Justice O'Connell explained that the objectors to the issue advised him this morning that they would not further oppose the paving of the road and in exchange for that, he promised to help them secure from the Bradshaw interest, a 150 foot wide strip along those five residences. He advised that there were some problems with the Bradshaw interest in the conveyance but believes those have now been solved. He urged the Board to move forward with the paving. Ms. Lucille Hall, Route 2, Box 546, Wadesboro Road, appeared and stated that the majority of property owners want the road paved. She urged the Board to move forward with the paving. Commissioner Joanos suggested amending the motion to put a time frame on acquisition of the property. Commissioner Host recommended that "within 30 days," the acquisition be satisfied. Commissioner Thaell agreed with the amendment to the motion. (Part one of the motion would read "if those who live at the east end of the road are able to acquire lands at their cost, within 30 days, to move the road northward of their property to satisfy their preferences, the location of the road will be moved northward on the acquired lands." Justice O'Connell indicated that he had no objection to the 30 day period, and that it was his understanding of the motion that the proviso states that if they can get the land, the road will be moved further to the north, if they do not get the land, it will be paved where it is. Commissioner Thaell stated that he received a call today and was told the offer has been accepted. Commissioner Host called the question which carried 6 - 1 (Commissioner Kio-Green voted in opposition). The motion on the floor by Commissioner Host carried unanimously. The Board stated that the time frame is 30 days and if it appears that it will take longer than 30 days, staff should advise the Board. 11. REQUEST TO REFUND TALLAHASSEE MALL'S TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE The Board considered a request from the Tallahassee Mall to refund a portion of transportation impact fees; $118,418.08 of their total $376,784.80 paid. County Administrator Alam explained that the Board has until September 30, 2000, to either use those fees or encumber those fees for a project countywide. He explained that there is a disagreement between the applicant and staff on this issue. Mr. Alam explained that based on the current ordinance the fees cannot be refunded today. He explained that currently there is a total of $5 million of impact fees paid by various developers and there may be other requests for refunding. He explained that it would be difficult to determine whose fees should be refunded. Mr. Charles A. Francis of the law firm of Francis and Sweet, appeared on behalf of Tallahassee Mall Partners Limited, and stated that he realizes that the first time his client can legally apply under the ordinance for refund would be September 1, 1999. He stated that this does not change the position on their request tonight and he is requesting an early refund on one portion of the fund which is designated state road system that was in the County-wide impact fee or the total amount of the total fund. Tallahassee Mall paid $376,784.00 of impact fees in 1991; of that amount $118,418.08 was put in the county-wide impact fund and under the ordinance that can only be used for designated state road improvements. (He noted that Miccosukee Road is not one of those roads.) Mr. Francis stated that there has to be a direct relationship between the fee charged and how it is used and it is his understanding that there are no projects that will come into play that can be funded from that money on North Monroe Street within the period of time before the refund would be due. He stated that if that is true and the funds cannot be properly used for state roads impacted by his client's project (Tallahassee Mall), then he requests the funds be refunded. He stated that the appropriate question is: if the money has been legitimately spent on a road that Tallahassee Mall has impacted, then they are not due a refund; if it has not, then a refund should be granted. He also explained that he is not requesting the northeast quadrant money at this time since his client will not be entitled to it until 1999, however his position will not change in 1999; the money must be used for roads impacted by his project; if they have been used on roads not impacted by his project or have helped a competitor, he will apply for a refund. He stated that it is important the Board know how the money is being spent and whether or not it is being spent on roads impacting others than those persons whom the money is collected. Commissioner Kio-Green advised that transportation planning staff will be bringing forward information at the next MPO meeting on how they are going to suggest to go about distributing the impact fee monies. County Attorney Thiele explained that where he and Mr. Francis disagree is regarding the 1989 study which the Board adopted by reference in the impact fee ordinance. The Commission made a legislative determination that county-wide impact fees were to be spent on state roads and had a direct relationship with all properties within the County, even if they were spent on roadways that did not touch the property in question. He stated that legal staff is of the opinion that there is no problem with fees being spent on other streets (such as Apalachee Parkway, Pensacola Street, etc.). Commissioner Yordon stated that when the ordinance was adopted, the Board told the development community that the money would be spent on projects directly related to their impact, and if it was not spent on that, it would be returned within seven years. Mr. Thomas Strauss, 222 Lakeview Avenue, Suite 800, West Palm Beach, Florida, owner of Tallahassee Mall at 2415 North Monroe Street, appeared and explained that he was involved in the calculations of the impact fee and when the impact fee was collected, it was based on impacts to certain roads and it was on those particular roads that the fee was assessed. He also advised that the project is not a DRI since it was built prior to 1974. He explained that the money he is requesting will be used for a project with the City for the Tumbling Tots Center currently under construction adjacent to the Mall. He proposes to give the City $75,000 outright; pay for the study and construction of a road connecting the Tumbling Tots Center to the Mall so that mall parking can be used; for additional land on the city property for some 21 parking spaces; and increasing capacity of the retention pond for future construction of an aquatic center. He is also proposing to give $25,000 to the Tourist Development Council for advertising the promotion of various events and $10,000 will be given for a scholarship program for the City Parks and Recreation for the Tumbling Tots Center. County Administrator Alam explained an analysis would have to be made to determine the amount of monies spent on certain roads. Commissioner Kio-Green suggested that staff conduct more information-gathering and raised various questions and concerns: Why are specific roads or segments of roads designated as impact fee roads; suggested looking at specifics and obtaining information from transportation planning staff; indicating that the MPO and the Planning Commission has a role; what is the interest being made off of the fees; and whether there are any roadway segments for which there are not planned improvements. Commissioner Kio-Green further stated that if the County has monies which they have collected that can only be used on certain segments of roads, the Board should consider changing the ordinance so monies can be refunded (if the county is not making as much percentage as there is to refund at the end of the 8 year period). Commissioner Yordon stated that the Board told the community at the time the ordinance was considered that the money would be used for roads directly impacting their development and asked for their support. Commissioner Yordon moved and was duly seconded by Commissioner Joanos to ask staff to continue looking at this problem and bring back something that further examines this specific request and addresses the overall issue with a recommendation on how, if staff finds that there is equity in returning funds to certain individuals, that it not be precedent-setting and that would be the 18-month, 12-month, or 6-month provision, or some other time period. He stated that there should be some way to know if the money is not going to be spent. Commissioner Thaell stated that this is a policy issue that should be addressed through an amendment to the ordinance. He indicated concern as to what is being done with these impact fee monies collected and asked why they are not being spent. Chairman Host stated that he does not want to open the floodgates for requests for funds, and recommended going back through the law carefully and make sure the County is on solid ground. He suggested proceeding cautiously, and indicated that perhaps a balance can be drawn as to what is in the public good. Following considerable discussion, the motion on the floor carried unanimously. 18. PUBLIC HEARING - PROPOSED ORDINANCE REGARDING THE CONTRACTOR'S LICENSING BOARD Pursuant to the attached legal advertisement, a public hearing was conducted on the Contractor's Licensing and Examination Board amending the CLB's jurisdiction and authority. Mr. Ed Dion, 1105 Lopian Drive, Dion Builders, appeared and stated that the proposed ordinance is needed but requested that the matter be continued until minor issues are addressed. Commissioner Davis moved that the public hearing be continued. There was no second to the motion. Mrs. Karen Chapman, Ox Bottom Manor, advised that she supports the proposed ordinance and explained that she has several code violations against the builder of her home and hopes the ordinance will remedy the situation. She stated that the builder has not picked up his certified mail notifying him of the hearing before the Contractors and Licensing Board. The Chairman requested that Mr. Ray Burroughs, Building Inspection, meet with Mrs. Chapman. Mr. John Koelemij, 1006 Gardenia Drive, certified contractor, indicated that there are differences in the State Licensing Board and the proposed ordinance, and stated that he will provide the County Attorney with some items to consider when considering the proposed ordinance. Mr. Koelimij stated that the industry basically supports the proposed ordinance. Ms. Susan Hudson, 4833 Easy Street, requested that the Board adopt the proposed ordinance. She advised of problems with the construction of her home and stated that builders should be made responsible. Ms. Martha Ruis, 4828 Easy Street, stated that her home was built two years ago and she has been fighting with her builder to address construction problems and building code violations. She indicated that she supported the proposed ordinance. Mr. Kevin Starling, 4837 Easy Street, voiced the same concerns as his neighbors regarding code violations in his home. He stated that the ordinance will make it easier to make builders comply. Mr. George E. Lewis, II, 203-6 N. Gasdsen Street, appeared and voiced concerns regarding the ordinance numbering system and recommended that it be changed. He indicated that the Contractors and Licensing Board should be looked at on a broader scope. He referred to the Florida Statutes and regulations of statewide contractors and registered contractors; suggested consideration of policy issues and suggested that the ordinance delineate a specific fund for fines. Mr. Lewis referred to State Law and suggested that Section 8 show similar language for the effective date. Mr. Bert Davey, 414 E. Seventh Avenue, licensed contractor, appeared and suggested that contractors be regulated separately from the state. He explained that he is not opposed to the ordinance, although he has some concerns with certain sections, and stated that all registered contractors should be notified that an ordinance is being considered. Mr. Davey raised the following issues: How much will it cost to fund the proposed ordinance (staffing); a definition section is needed; if the building and zoning code is violated, the contractor could be brought up before the LCB, when the violations could be corrected without such action; define the difference between fraud and deceit; what is the definition of "gross negligence." He urged the Board to continue the issue. Mr. Bill Vanlandingham, state certified general contractor and member of the CLB, appeared and stated that the proposed ordinance is needed and urged its adoption. Mr. Don Chapman, 6303 Coach Horse Court, appeared and suggested that others be appointed to the CLB and not just contractors. He suggested that this issue be continued as recommended by the Contractors Licensing Board, and that builders be notified of the proposed ordinance. He reported that he is aware of a builder in town that operates without a contractor's license and pulls permits under another contractors' license. Mr. Chapman stated that the builder has ignored the certified mail advising of a hearing before the CLB. Mr. Ray Burroughs, Chief Building Inspector, appeared and responded to inquiries regarding the certified mail and notice requirements. Commissioner Kio-Green suggested that the ordinance or policies be addressed regarding certified mail that is not picked up within a certain timeframe (which results in postponement of an appearance before the Licensing and Contractors Board). The Board concurred. Mr. John Salvo, Chairman of the Contractors and Licensing Board for Leon County, appeared and indicated that improper information has been given to the Board. He explained that the reason they initiated this ordinance is because of changes to F.S. 489 which makes available to the Board a means of punishment for contractors who have violations including fining contractors and restitution to homeowners. Mr. Salvo indicated that a license can be pulled under someone else's name according to State Statutes 489. Commissioner Yordon requested that staff investigate this issue. Commissioner Thaell moved and duly seconded by Commissioner Kio-Green to adopt the ordinance as presented and appoint a user committee to address inconsistencies addressed by Mr. Lewis and others, and bring back a "glitch bill" within a few months. Following some discussion, Commissioner Thaell withdrew his motion and Commissioner Kio-Green withdrew her second. Commissioner Yordon moved and was duly seconded by Commissioner Davis to continue this item until April 23, 1996. Commissioner Yordon stated that the industry has requested that this be continued and he would like the issue of "subbing" out a contractors license be brought back. County Attorney Thiele explained that addressing the use of certifications or the unlicensed contractor issue would have to be addressed in a separate ordinance. The Board stated that the issues can still be brought back as part of discussions. The motion carried unanimously. Chairman Host stated that when this issue is brought back that staff address comments made tonight regarding whether or not they can be incorporated into the ordinance. He also recommended that in the future, user groups and other appropriate groups be involved in the process prior to coming to the Board. 12. EISENHOWER ROAD CLAY PIT The Chairman advised that this item has been delayed and will be brought back to the Board on April 9, 1996. DISCUSSION ITEM BY COMMISSIONER YORDON Commissioner Yordon referred to his memorandum and a letter from the City of Tallahassee advising that the City will be addressing at their meeting, tomorrow, various options for disposal of the City's solid waste and will probably approve request for proposals (RFP). Commissioner Yordon stated that the City believes the County has eight years of life at the County landfill and plenty of time for a RFP, which they do not. He stated that he did not feel that the City and County should go in separate directions in the management of their solid waste and suggested that the City assist the County in developing a RFP for disposal of the County's (including the City's) solid waste. He suggested that the RFP be for the hauling and disposal of the entire County's Class I waste. Commissioner Yordon suggested that the County proceed with the RFP for professional services to design a County-owned and operated transfer station to handle the entire County waste stream. Commissioner Yordon moved to ask the City to go back to the original request, which is for the County to do a separate RFP for transportation and disposal of the entire County's Class I waste, and invite the City to help design the RFP (participate in the criteria). Commissioner Joanos seconded the motion which carried unanimously. The County Administrator advised that the RFP would be brought to the Board on May 31, 1996. See attached memorandum: (Commissioner Yordon left the meeting at approximately 7:10 p.m. due to illness.) 13. NUISANCE AND ABATEMENT ORDINANCE Upon the request of Commissioner Kio-Green, the County Attorney's office researched the issue to determine whether there was any existing ordinance in place which gives the Code Enforcement Board the authority to inspect commercial property and cite owners for non-compliance (the specific property causing concern was "Billy's Bar"). County Attorney Thiele explained that it was determined that no such ordinance was in place, but advised that other counties remedy such problems under a noise and abatement ordinance. An ordinance was drafted for the Board's consideration. Mr. George E. Lewis, II, 203-6 N. Gadsden Street, appeared and referred to the draft ordinance. He stated that if the Board attacks nuisances, it should not be on something that is contradictory to the requirement in the Environmental Management Act (specifically that 25 percent of land remain in its natural state). The Chairman called on Martha Wellman to be heard. Commissioner Kio-Green announced that she had to leave but left a list of her concerns: She does support a nuisance ordinance but indicated concern over the potential impact of the language of the ordinance, expressed concerns for citizens who compose and maintain butterfly gardens and brushpiles to attract birds and rodents; requested changes to Section 1(2)a on page 3 of the draft. Ms. Deborah Newhall, 1518 Rankin Avenue, stated that she lives near "Billy's Bar" and stated that the proposed draft was "overkill," was written mainly for City and not rural areas of the County, and indicated support of a different nuisance ordinance. Chairman Host asked that if the issue was defined as "The Billy's Bar Ordinance," could an ordinance be drafted to deal with such an issue; the County Attorney answered in the affirmative. The Board indicated that they would not be interested in the "public nuisance ordinance" as drafted but would be interested in some other form of it. Commissioner Kio-Green moved, duly seconded by Commissioner Thaell and carried unanimously, 6-0, (Commissioner Yordon was not present), that the County Attorney take back this draft ordinance and bring back something that is more in the line of "buildings and structure." The Board indicated that they would like to see a more finished product. County Attorney Thiele advised that he would decrease the scope of the ordinance and would have "user group" discussions prior to bringing it back to the Board. 14. EMPLOYEE INNOVATION PROGRAM AWARD Commissioner Davis moved, duly seconded by Commissioner Maloy and carried unanimously, 6 - 0 (Commissioner Yordon was not present), to approve the employee innovation suggestion award to Mr. Joe Anderson in the amount of $320 for his suggestion and approve the attached budget amendment. (Mr. Anderson's suggestion involves driver boards for Courthouse air handlers, outages, and repairs.) Chairman Host stated that in the future, the policy should be clarified as to whether the suggestions are a joint or single effort. Commissioner Thaell stated that the awards are an administrative function and the County does like to keep up with innovative suggestions, but it is not necessary to come to the Board for approval. It was the consensus of the Board that a presentation be made but that the issue be handled administratively, and that the policy be changed if necessary. 15. TAX CERTIFICATES The Board considered whether or not to apply for tax deeds on Tax Certificates which will expire on May 24, 1996. It was noted that the County is the holder of 36 1989 Tax Certificates which will be cancelled and declared null and void by May 24, 1996. Commissioner Thaell moved, duly seconded by Commissioner Davis and carried 5 - 1 (Commissioner Joanos voted in opposition and Commissioner Yordon was not present), to apply for the tax deed and direct staff to present an agenda item for determination of purchase options for every sale. County Administrator Alam explained that the County will apply for the tax deeds and an auction will be held. If no one buys the tax deeds at the auction, then the County will have 90 days to purchase. Commissioner Kio-Green stated that if something advantageous comes forward, the County Administrator should bring it to the Board's attention. She also suggested that all the delinquent tax deed certificates be brought forward (after two years). The County Administrator will bring the issue back as an agenda item. 16. QUARTERLY MEETINGS WITH CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS AND JUDICIAL OFFICERS Chairman Host suggested scheduling quarterly meetings with the Constitutional Officers to discuss matters of mutual concern (such as cost saving initiatives, etc.) where each other's cooperation and assistance is needed. Commissioner Kio-Green moved, duly seconded by Commissioner Davis and carried unanimously 6 - 0, (Commissioner Yordon was not present), to approve the concept and meeting schedule, and authorize the Chairman to send letters of invitation to all Constitutional and Judicial Officers. Commissioner Thaell asked how this concept would affect the Commission liaisons with constitutional officers. Chairman Host stated that he was not sure how this would affect that process, but this was not an attempt to undermine the liaison process. 16. APPOINTMENTS a. Chaires/Capitola Community Center Board of Directors - Commissioner Yordon's appointment was continued since he was not present. b. Child Care Licensing and Examination Board - Commissioner Kio-Green moved, duly seconded by Commissioner Davis and carried unanimously, 6 - 0 (Commissioner Yordon was not present), to reappoint Mr. Stan Parsons. c. Contractors Licensing and Examination Board - Commissioner Yordon's appointment was continued since he was not present. Commissioner Maloy reappointed John Salvo. Chairman Host reappointed Rick Moore. Commissioner Kio-Green appointed Bert Davey. d. Cultural Resources Commission - Commissioner Thaell moved, duly seconded by Commissioner Davis and carried 6 - 0 (Commissioner Yordon was not present), to appoint Jorges Olaves and Ron Davis. Commissioner Kio-Green suggested that more nominations be provided by the Cultural Resources Commission. The Board concurred. e. Health and Human Services Board, District 2 - The Board deferred this item. Commissioner Thaell raised some concerns regarding appointments and nominations having to be screened by the Nominee Qualifications Review Committee and suggested that Mr. Keith Youchock be given consideration for appointment. The Board advised that this item would be placed on the agenda for the next meeting. f. Human Services Grant Review Committee - Commissioner Kio-Green continued her appointment until April 9. g. Nominations Qualifications Review Committee, HRS District 2 - The Board continued this item until April 9. h. Tourist Development Council - Chairman Host recommended the appointment of Mickey Bradey to replace Lou Ann Jordan and Don Schlinger. The Board concurred. i. Woodville Community Center Board of Directors - Commissioner Kio-Green stated that she thought that there were seven members and that each Commissioner makes an appointment. The Board concurred that there be seven appointments by each Commissioner and that the issue be brought back to the Board. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD Ms. Lila Richardson, 3017 Baron Lane, Crown Ridge Estates, appeared and requested the Board's support in changing the current age limit of 16 years when children can drop out of school and that this matter be taken to the Legislature. Ms. Richardson also requested that children be allowed to work at age 14 rather than 16. The Board advised that children cannot drop out of school without parental consent, and the age limit is established by State Law. Commissioner Joanos moved to adopt a resolution to be sent to the Legislature requesting support that the age limit for dropping out of school be changed to age 18. There was no second to the motion, but the Board concurred that the County Administrator draft appropriate resolution language to be sent to the Legislature. See attached Resolution R96-07: DISCUSSION ITEMS BY COMMISSIONERS COMMISSIONER THAELL a. Circulated a workbook that was presented during the Chinese Tallow Awareness Day event at Lake Jackson on Saturday (which was coordinated by the County Forester and DEP). Commissioner Thaell explained staff is working with local nurseries to ensure that they do not sell the Chinese Tallow because of its adverse affect on waterbodies (leaves are toxic to fish) and advised that some counties in Florida are considering ordinances to restrict planting of this tree. Commissioners Kio-Green and Thaell indicated that they would not object to considering an ordinance or an ordinance amendment to the Environmental Management Act Ordinance. b. Commissioner Thaell reported that he received several calls regarding Lake Shore Gardens development on Meridian Road and was under the impression that there was action taken by Growth Management and Public Works. Commissioner Thaell requested clarification on this issue. Mr. Gary Johnson, Department of Growth and Environmental Management, appeared and reported that he received an E-Mail message which he read indicating the following: The site was muddy, was receiving run-off from off-site, erosion control has not been maintained, the contractor is being contacted to receive a verbal warning to immediately correct the problem, and Public Works has put the project on hold pending drainage corrections by the project engineer. Staff will conduct follow-up on Friday. COMMISSIONER DAVIS a. Publicly thanked Public Works Director Mike Willett for assisting with the structure for the Woodville Community ball fields. b. Advised that the 46th Southern Provincial Counsel for Kappa Alpha will be meeting in Tallahassee and requested a Resolution for their community meeting on Thursday. The Board concurred that Commissioner Davis deliver the resolution. Commissioner Maloy requested that the Tourist Development Council be advised and a copy of the resolution be provided to the Director. CHAIRMAN HOST a. Reported that the DOT has increased the speed limit on I-10 (between Jefferson and Gadsden County) to 70 mph effective April 5, 1996. b. Requested adoption of a resolution for "Keep Tallahassee-Leon County Beautiful" for Keep America Beautiful Month. The Board concurred. c. A County staff member will be present for a presentation, representing the County, for the St. Marks Trail Association for support of the Gopher, Frogs, and Tortoise Trail. d. Reminded the Board of the Miccosukee Road closure (between Capital Circle and Riggins Road) which will occur on April 2 through July 31 (120 days). Chairman Host stated that this will disrupt the general traveling public on Centerville Road, Capital Circle NE, and Mahan Drive because of traffic diversion, and urged the contractor to do everything possible to accelerate the process. Mr. Tony Park, Public Works, advised that pamphlets have been mailed out and will be passed out on Miccosukee Road. e. Chairman Host requested that the Board consider a two- thirds/two-thirds program to build sidewalks within the urban service area of the county for subdivisions that do not have sidewalks, and to expand the idea to require subdivisions that are built within the urban service area to build sidewalks. The Board concurred. There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p.m. APPROVED: Bruce J. Host Chairman ATTEST: Clerk of the Circuit Court