BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
                      LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA
                         REGULAR MEETING
                         MARCH 26, 1996


     The Board of County Commissioners of Leon County, Florida, met
in regular session at 5:00 p.m. with Chairman Host presiding.   
Those in attendance were Commissioners Yordon, Joanos, Davis,
Maloy, Kio-Green, and Thaell.  Also in attendance were County
Attorney Herb Thiele, County Administrator Parwez Alam, Deputy
Clerk Bill Bogan, Jr., and Secretary Sandra C. O'Neal.

     The meeting opened with Invocation provided by Commissioner
Davis followed by the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.

AWARDS AND PRESENTATIONS

     A presentation was made to the Planning Department
     "Acknowledgment of Outstanding Achievement of selling the most
     tickets of any County Department for the 1996 March of Dimes
     WalkAmerica".  Chairman Host presented a plaque to the
     Planning Department staff, and the Board congratulated the
     department on its achievement.

CONSENT AGENDA

     Commissioner Maloy moved, duly seconded by Commissioner Kio-
Green and carried unanimously, to approve the Consent Agenda
     as follows with the exception of items 4 and 5 which were
     addressed as described:

1.   BILLS AND VOUCHERS

     The Board approved the following County bills and authorized
     the Chairman and the Clerk to issue the proper warrants:
     $ 1,017,981.36

2.   CONSERVATION EASEMENTS AND PLATS OF RIVERSIDE AT CROOKED ROAD

     The Board accepted the conservation easements (Malone Peddie,
     Darleen Peddie, Brad Peddie, and Bill Clark) and directed
     staff to record them in the public records of Leon County and
     approve the plats of Riverside at Crooked Road Units 1 and 2
     and directed staff to proceed with the recording in the public
     records of Leon County.

3.   RE-PLAT OF LOT 2 OF DAVIDSON SUBDIVISION

     The Board approved the replat of Lot 2 of Davidson Subdivision
     and directed staff to proceed with the recording of the plat
     in the public records of Leon County.
               (The developers, Michael W. Forsthoefel and Jana M. Bures-
Forsthoefel made the request for the replat of the subdivision
     which is located at the intersection of Audubon Drive and
     Woodley Road and consists of 14.86 acres divided into six
     lots.)

4.   NON-RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION OF SEGMENT OF NINA ROAD

     Commissioner Kio-Green pulled this item to suggest that staff
     follow up on any possibility of purchasing the property prior
     to development on the site.  Planning Department Director
     Wendy Gray advised that staff was notified by a property owner
     who indicated that it may be beneficial to acquire this
     property rather than do the redesignation.   

     Commissioner Kio-Green moved, duly seconded by Commissioner
     Joanos and carried unanimously, to approve the designation of
     Nina Road between Blountstown Highway and Pensacola Street as
     a non-residential street, and that staff look into the
     possibility of purchasing the property prior to development.

5.   CONFIRMATION OF BOARD DIRECTION AT WORKSHOP ON GROWTH AND
     ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SERVICE COST EVALUATION

     Chairman Host pulled this item to report that he has asked the
     County Administrator to look at DEP standards and report back
     to the Board.  (It was his understanding that the City is now
     looking into administering permits on the part of DEP so there
     are not two permitting agencies.) 

     Commissioner Kio-Green moved, duly seconded by Commissioner
     Davis and carried unanimously, to approve staff recommendation
     to confirm the list of seven issues and concerns listed in the
     analysis to be addressed by staff.  (See attached:)

6.   REQUEST TO SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE CITY'S PRE-
APPLICATION TO OPERATE A WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ON LOVIC
     ROAD

     The Board scheduled a public hearing for 6:00 p.m., April 23,
     1996 on the City of Tallahassee's pre-application to operate
     a water distribution system on Lovic Road (south of Oakridge
     Road, two miles west of Woodville Highway).

7.   REQUEST TO SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING TO ADOPT THE HOUSING
     ASSISTANCE PLAN FOR THE SHIP PROGRAM

     The Board scheduled a public hearing for 6:00 p.m. April 9,
     1996, to adopt a Housing Assistance Plan for the State Housing
     Initiatives Partnership (SHIP) Program.

8.   JTPA JOBS AND BENEFIT JOINT TRAINING PLAN FOR GADSDEN, LEON
     AND WAKULLA COUNTIES

     The Board approved the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) and
     Jobs and Benefit Joint Job Training Plan for Gadsden, Leon,
     and Wakulla counties for submittal to the Department of Labor
     and Employment Security.

9.   ADJUSTMENT TO TIMETABLE FOR COUNTY WORKSHOPS 

     The Board adopted the attached timetable for County workshops,
     with the meetings to conclude at 4:00 p.m.

     GENERAL BUSINESS

10.  WADESBORO ROAD

     Staff has secured five right-of-way dedications granting Leon
     County a 60-foot right-of-way for a portion of the Wadesboro
     Road Paving Project.  These right-of-way dedications were
     presented to the Board on July 11, 1995, and were approved and
     accepted.

     County Attorney Thiele explained that the issue is whether or
     not, in light of objections from certain property owners in
     the area, the County Public Works should proceed with the
     project.  One of the issues is whether or not the County has
     right-of-way and sufficient quantity of right-of-way to
     proceed with the project.  Mr. Thiele stated that there are
     questions raised on this issue but he believes that to a vast
     majority of the property, there is "color of title," a claim
     that the County could acquire some of that through either
     exercise of the County's rights or through a conveyance from
     original grantor (Judge O'Connell).  He  explained that this
     may or may not suffice because of other residents in the area. 
     Mr. Thiele advised that the question before the Board is
     "whether or not the County, because of the controversy or
     potential controversy (which could result in litigation),
     wishes to go forward or cancel the project."  One of the
     methods of resolving it would be to bring declaratory judgment
     action to determine who owns or has title to the dirt road
     itself.  

     Chairman Host explained that approximately one year ago, he
     requested that this item be withdrawn in deference to the
     property owners who wanted to negotiate with a neighbor across
     the street and acquire property that would cause the road to
     be moved into a new location; the car road would act as a
     buffer.  He further explained that apparently there was
     misunderstanding on the part of the property owners on whether
     or not they would have to go through a subdivision process
     among other issues, which appear to have been addressed.

     Commissioner Host moved that Public Works be directed to
     proceed as quickly as possible with all necessary planning,
     and work to accomplish the paving of Wadesboro Road, West,
     with two provisions:  one, that if those who live at the east
     end of the road are able to acquire the lands at their cost,
     to move the road northward of their property to satisfy their
     preferences the location of the road will be moved northward
     on the acquired lands, and; two, that the width of the
     contributed right-of-way and construction on the westerly
     portion may be modified to avoid encroaching too closely on 
     the church and residences located along that portion of the
     road.  Commissioner Thaell seconded the motion.
               Justice Steven C. O'Connell appeared representing his family
     who owns three-quarters of a mile on the south side of the
     road who have given a dedication.  He stated that the Bradshaw
     interest has given a dedication on the north side of the road,
     and all but one property owner on the south side, westerly end
     have given a dedication.  Justice O'Connell explained that the
     objectors to the issue advised him this morning that they
     would not further oppose the paving of the road and in
     exchange for that, he promised to help them secure from the
     Bradshaw interest, a 150 foot wide strip along those five
     residences.  He advised that there were some problems with the
     Bradshaw interest in the conveyance but believes those have
     now been solved.  He urged the Board to move forward with the
     paving.

     Ms. Lucille Hall, Route 2, Box 546, Wadesboro Road, appeared
     and stated that the majority of property owners want the road
     paved.  She urged the Board to move forward with the paving.

     Commissioner Joanos suggested amending the motion to put a
     time frame on acquisition of the property.  Commissioner Host
     recommended that "within 30 days," the acquisition be
     satisfied.  Commissioner Thaell agreed with the amendment to
     the motion.  (Part one of the motion would read "if those who
     live at the east end of the road are able to acquire lands at
     their cost, within 30 days, to move the road northward of
     their property to satisfy their preferences, the location of
     the road will be moved northward on the acquired lands."

     Justice O'Connell indicated that he had no objection to the 30
     day period, and that it was his understanding of the motion
     that the proviso states that if they can get the land, the
     road will be moved further to the north, if they do not get
     the land, it will be paved where it is.  Commissioner Thaell
     stated that he received a call today and was told the offer
     has been accepted.

     Commissioner Host called the question which carried 6 - 1
     (Commissioner Kio-Green voted in opposition).

     The motion on the floor by Commissioner Host carried
     unanimously.  The Board stated that the time frame is 30 days
     and if it appears that it will take longer than 30 days, staff
     should advise the Board.

11.  REQUEST TO REFUND TALLAHASSEE MALL'S TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE

     The Board considered a request from the Tallahassee Mall to
     refund a portion of transportation impact fees; $118,418.08 of
     their total $376,784.80 paid.


               County Administrator Alam explained that the Board has until
     September 30, 2000, to either use those fees or encumber those
     fees for a project countywide.  He explained that there is a
     disagreement between the applicant and staff on this issue. 
     Mr. Alam explained that based on the current ordinance the
     fees cannot be refunded today.  He explained that currently
     there is a total of $5 million of impact fees paid by various
     developers and there may be other requests for refunding.  He
     explained that it would be difficult to determine whose fees
     should be refunded.

     Mr. Charles A. Francis of the law firm of Francis and Sweet,
     appeared on behalf of Tallahassee Mall Partners Limited, and
     stated that he realizes that the first time his client can
     legally apply under the ordinance for refund would be
     September 1, 1999.  He stated that this does not change the
     position on their request tonight and he is requesting an
     early refund on one portion of the fund which is designated
     state road system that was in the County-wide impact fee or
     the total amount of the total fund.  Tallahassee Mall paid
     $376,784.00 of impact fees in 1991; of that amount $118,418.08
     was put in the county-wide impact fund and under the ordinance
     that can only be used for designated state road improvements.
     (He noted that Miccosukee Road is not one of those roads.) 
     Mr. Francis stated that there has to be a direct relationship
     between the fee charged and how it is used and it is his
     understanding that there are no projects that will come into
     play that can be funded from that money on North Monroe Street
     within the period of time before the refund would be due.  He
     stated that if that is true and the funds cannot be properly
     used for state roads impacted by his client's project
     (Tallahassee Mall), then he requests the funds be refunded. 
     He stated that the appropriate question is:  if the money has
     been legitimately spent on a road that Tallahassee Mall has
     impacted, then they are not due a refund;  if it has not, then
     a refund should be granted.  He also explained that he is not
     requesting the northeast quadrant money at this time since his
     client will not be entitled to it until 1999, however his
     position will not change in 1999; the money must be used for
     roads impacted by his project; if they have been used on roads
     not impacted by his project or have helped a competitor, he
     will apply for a refund.  He stated that it is important the
     Board know how the money is being spent and whether or not it
     is being spent on roads impacting others than those persons
     whom the money is collected.

     Commissioner Kio-Green advised that transportation planning
     staff will be bringing forward information at the next MPO
     meeting on how they are going to suggest to go about
     distributing the impact fee monies.


               County Attorney Thiele explained that where he and Mr. Francis
     disagree is regarding the 1989 study which the Board adopted
     by reference in the impact fee ordinance.  The Commission made
     a legislative determination that county-wide impact fees were
     to be spent on state roads and had a direct relationship with
     all properties within the County, even if they were spent on
     roadways that did not touch the property in question.  He
     stated that legal staff is of the opinion that there is no
     problem with fees being spent on other streets (such as
     Apalachee Parkway, Pensacola Street, etc.).

     Commissioner Yordon stated that when the ordinance was
     adopted, the Board told the development community that the
     money would be spent on projects directly related to their
     impact, and if it was not spent on that, it would be returned
     within seven years.

     Mr. Thomas Strauss, 222 Lakeview Avenue, Suite 800, West Palm
     Beach, Florida, owner of Tallahassee Mall at 2415 North Monroe
     Street, appeared and explained that he was involved in the
     calculations of the impact fee and when the impact fee was
     collected, it was based on impacts to certain roads and it was
     on those particular roads that the fee was assessed.  He also
     advised that the project is not a DRI since it was built prior
     to 1974.  He explained that the money he is requesting will be
     used for a project with the City for the Tumbling Tots Center
     currently under construction adjacent to the Mall.  He
     proposes to give the City $75,000 outright; pay for the study
     and construction of a road connecting the Tumbling Tots Center
     to the Mall so that mall parking can be used; for additional
     land on the city property for some 21 parking spaces; and
     increasing capacity of the retention pond for future
     construction of an aquatic center.  He is also proposing to
     give $25,000 to the Tourist Development Council for
     advertising the promotion of various events and $10,000 will
     be given for a scholarship program for the City Parks and
     Recreation for the Tumbling Tots Center.     

     County Administrator Alam explained an analysis would have to
     be made to determine the amount of monies spent on certain
     roads.

     Commissioner Kio-Green suggested that staff conduct more
     information-gathering and raised various questions and
     concerns:  Why are specific roads or segments of roads
     designated as impact fee roads; suggested looking at specifics
     and obtaining information from transportation planning staff;
     indicating that the MPO and the Planning Commission has a
     role; what is the interest being made off of the fees; and
     whether there are any roadway segments for which there are not
     planned improvements.

               Commissioner Kio-Green further stated that if the County has
     monies which they have collected that can only be used on
     certain segments of roads, the Board should consider changing
     the ordinance so monies can be refunded (if the county is not
     making as much percentage as there is to refund at the end of
     the 8 year period).

     Commissioner Yordon stated that the Board told the community
     at the time the ordinance was considered that the money would
     be used for roads directly impacting their development and
     asked for their support.  

     Commissioner Yordon moved and was duly seconded by
     Commissioner Joanos to ask staff to continue looking at this
     problem and bring back something that further examines this
     specific request and addresses the overall issue with a
     recommendation on how, if staff finds that there is equity in
     returning funds to certain individuals, that it not be
     precedent-setting and that would be the 18-month, 12-month, or
     6-month provision, or some other time period.  He stated that
     there should be some way to know if the money is not going to
     be spent.  

     Commissioner Thaell stated that this is a policy issue that
     should be addressed through an amendment to the ordinance.  He
     indicated concern as to what is being done with these impact
     fee monies collected and asked why they are not being spent. 

     Chairman Host stated that he does not want to open the
     floodgates for requests for funds, and recommended going back
     through the law carefully and make sure the County is on solid
     ground.  He suggested proceeding cautiously, and indicated
     that perhaps a balance can be drawn as to what is in the
     public good.

     Following considerable discussion, the motion on the floor
     carried unanimously.

18.  PUBLIC HEARING - PROPOSED ORDINANCE REGARDING THE CONTRACTOR'S
     LICENSING BOARD

     Pursuant to the attached legal advertisement, a public hearing
     was conducted on the Contractor's Licensing and Examination
     Board amending the CLB's jurisdiction and authority.

     Mr. Ed Dion, 1105 Lopian Drive, Dion Builders, appeared and
     stated that the proposed ordinance is needed but requested
     that the matter be continued until minor issues are addressed.

     Commissioner Davis moved that the public hearing be continued. 
     There was no second to the motion.

     Mrs. Karen Chapman, Ox Bottom Manor, advised that she supports
     the proposed ordinance and explained that she has several code
     violations against the builder of her home and hopes the
     ordinance will remedy the situation.  She stated that the
     builder has not picked up his certified mail notifying him of
     the hearing before the Contractors and Licensing Board.  The
     Chairman requested that Mr. Ray Burroughs, Building
     Inspection, meet with Mrs. Chapman.

     Mr. John Koelemij, 1006 Gardenia Drive, certified contractor,
     indicated that there are differences in the State Licensing
     Board and the proposed ordinance, and stated that he will
     provide the County Attorney with some items to consider when
     considering the proposed ordinance.  Mr. Koelimij stated that
     the industry basically supports the proposed ordinance.

     Ms. Susan Hudson, 4833 Easy Street, requested that the Board
     adopt the proposed ordinance.  She advised of problems with
     the construction of her home and stated that builders should
     be made responsible.

     Ms. Martha Ruis, 4828 Easy Street, stated that her home was
     built two years ago and she has been fighting with her builder
     to address construction problems and building code violations. 
     She indicated that she supported the proposed ordinance.

     Mr. Kevin Starling, 4837 Easy Street, voiced the same concerns
     as his neighbors regarding code violations in his home.  He
     stated that the ordinance will make it easier to make builders
     comply.

     Mr. George E. Lewis, II, 203-6 N. Gasdsen Street, appeared and
     voiced concerns regarding the ordinance numbering system and
     recommended that it be changed.  He indicated that the
     Contractors and Licensing Board should be looked at on a
     broader scope.  He referred to the Florida Statutes and
     regulations of statewide contractors and registered
     contractors; suggested consideration of policy issues and
     suggested that the ordinance delineate a specific fund for
     fines.  Mr. Lewis referred to State Law and suggested that
     Section 8 show similar language for the effective date.

     Mr. Bert Davey, 414 E. Seventh Avenue, licensed contractor,
     appeared and suggested that contractors be regulated
     separately from the state.  He explained that he is not
     opposed to the ordinance, although he has some concerns with
     certain sections, and stated that all registered contractors
     should be notified that an ordinance is being considered.




               Mr. Davey raised the following issues:  How much will it cost
     to fund the proposed ordinance (staffing); a definition
     section is needed; if the building and zoning code is
     violated, the contractor could be brought up before the LCB,
     when the violations could be corrected without such action;
     define the difference between fraud and deceit; what is the
     definition of "gross negligence."  He urged the Board to
     continue the issue.

     Mr. Bill Vanlandingham, state certified general contractor and
     member of the CLB, appeared and stated that the proposed
     ordinance is needed and urged its adoption.

     Mr. Don Chapman, 6303 Coach Horse Court, appeared and
     suggested that others be appointed to the CLB and not just
     contractors.  He suggested that this issue be continued as
     recommended by the Contractors Licensing Board, and that
     builders be notified of the proposed ordinance.  He reported
     that he is aware of a builder in town that operates without a
     contractor's license and pulls permits under another
     contractors' license.  Mr. Chapman stated that the builder has
     ignored the certified mail advising of a hearing before the
     CLB.

     Mr. Ray Burroughs, Chief Building Inspector, appeared and
     responded to inquiries regarding the certified mail and notice
     requirements.

     Commissioner Kio-Green suggested that the ordinance or
     policies be addressed regarding certified mail that is not
     picked up within a certain timeframe (which results in
     postponement of an appearance before the Licensing and
     Contractors Board).  The Board concurred.

     Mr. John Salvo, Chairman of the Contractors and Licensing
     Board for Leon County, appeared and indicated that improper
     information has been given to the Board.  He explained that
     the reason they initiated this ordinance is because of changes
     to F.S. 489 which makes available to the Board a means of
     punishment for contractors who have violations including
     fining contractors and restitution to homeowners.  Mr. Salvo
     indicated that a license can be pulled under someone else's
     name according to State Statutes 489.  Commissioner Yordon
     requested that staff investigate this issue.

     Commissioner Thaell moved and duly seconded by Commissioner
     Kio-Green to adopt the ordinance as presented and appoint a
     user committee to address inconsistencies addressed by Mr.
     Lewis and others, and bring back a "glitch bill" within a few
     months.


               Following some discussion, Commissioner Thaell withdrew his
     motion and Commissioner Kio-Green withdrew her second.

     Commissioner Yordon moved and was duly seconded by
     Commissioner Davis to continue this item until April 23, 1996. 
     Commissioner Yordon stated that the industry has requested
     that this be continued and he would like the issue of
     "subbing" out a contractors license be brought back.  County
     Attorney Thiele explained that addressing the use of
     certifications or the unlicensed contractor issue would have
     to be addressed in a separate ordinance.  The Board stated
     that the issues can still be brought back as part of
     discussions.  The motion carried unanimously.  Chairman Host
     stated that when this issue is brought back that staff address
     comments made tonight regarding whether or not they can be
     incorporated into the ordinance.  He also recommended that in
     the future, user groups and other appropriate groups be
     involved in the process prior to coming to the Board.

12.  EISENHOWER ROAD CLAY PIT

     The Chairman advised that this item has been delayed and will
     be brought back to the Board on April 9, 1996.

DISCUSSION ITEM BY COMMISSIONER YORDON

     Commissioner Yordon referred to his memorandum and a letter
     from the City of Tallahassee advising that the City will be
     addressing at their meeting, tomorrow, various options for
     disposal of the City's solid waste and will probably approve 
     request for proposals (RFP).  Commissioner Yordon stated that
     the City believes the County has eight years of life at the
     County landfill and plenty of time for a RFP, which they do
     not.  He stated that he did not feel that the City and County
     should go in separate directions in the management of their
     solid waste and suggested that the City assist the County in
     developing a RFP for disposal of the County's (including the
     City's) solid waste.  He suggested that the RFP be for the
     hauling and disposal of the entire County's Class I waste. 
     Commissioner Yordon suggested that the County proceed with the
     RFP for professional services to design a County-owned and
     operated transfer station to handle the entire County waste
     stream.   

     Commissioner Yordon moved to ask the City to go back to the
     original request, which is for the County to do a separate RFP
     for transportation and disposal of the entire County's Class
     I waste, and invite the City to help design the RFP
     (participate in the criteria).  Commissioner Joanos seconded
     the motion which carried unanimously.  The County
     Administrator advised that the RFP would be brought to the
     Board on May 31, 1996.  See attached memorandum:

     (Commissioner Yordon left the meeting at approximately 7:10
     p.m. due to illness.)

13.  NUISANCE AND ABATEMENT ORDINANCE

     Upon the request of Commissioner Kio-Green, the County
     Attorney's office researched the issue to determine whether
     there was any existing ordinance in place which gives the Code
     Enforcement Board the authority to inspect commercial property
     and cite owners for non-compliance (the specific property
     causing concern was "Billy's Bar").  County Attorney Thiele
     explained that it was determined that no such ordinance was in
     place, but advised that other counties remedy such problems
     under a noise and abatement ordinance.  An ordinance was
     drafted for the Board's consideration.

     Mr. George E. Lewis, II, 203-6 N. Gadsden Street, appeared and
     referred to the draft ordinance.  He stated that if the Board
     attacks nuisances, it should not be on something that is
     contradictory to the requirement in the Environmental
     Management Act (specifically that 25 percent of land remain in
     its natural state).

     The Chairman called on Martha Wellman to be heard. 
     Commissioner Kio-Green announced that she had to leave but
     left a list of her concerns:  She does support a nuisance
     ordinance but indicated concern over the potential impact of
     the language of the ordinance, expressed concerns for citizens
     who compose and maintain butterfly gardens and brushpiles to
     attract birds and rodents; requested changes to Section 1(2)a
     on page 3 of the draft. 

     Ms. Deborah Newhall, 1518 Rankin Avenue, stated that she lives
     near "Billy's Bar" and stated that the proposed draft was
     "overkill," was written mainly for City and not rural areas of
     the County, and indicated support of a different nuisance
     ordinance.

     Chairman Host asked that if the issue was defined as "The
     Billy's Bar Ordinance," could an ordinance be drafted to deal
     with such an issue;  the County Attorney answered in the
     affirmative.  The Board indicated that they would not be
     interested in the "public nuisance ordinance" as drafted but
     would be interested in some other form of it.

     Commissioner Kio-Green moved, duly seconded by Commissioner
     Thaell and carried unanimously, 6-0, (Commissioner Yordon was
     not present), that the County Attorney take back this draft
     ordinance and bring back something that is more in the line of
     "buildings and structure."  The Board indicated that they
     would like to see a more finished product.

               County Attorney Thiele advised that he would decrease the
     scope of the ordinance and would have "user group" discussions
     prior to bringing it back to the Board.

14.  EMPLOYEE INNOVATION PROGRAM AWARD

     Commissioner Davis moved, duly seconded by Commissioner Maloy
     and carried unanimously, 6 - 0 (Commissioner Yordon was not
     present), to approve the employee innovation suggestion award
     to Mr. Joe Anderson in the amount of $320 for his suggestion
     and approve the attached budget amendment.  (Mr. Anderson's
     suggestion involves driver boards for Courthouse air handlers,
     outages, and repairs.)  Chairman Host stated that in the
     future, the policy should be clarified as to whether the
     suggestions are a joint or single effort.

     Commissioner Thaell stated that the awards are an
     administrative function and the County does like to keep up
     with innovative suggestions, but it is not necessary to come
     to the Board for approval.  It was the consensus of the Board
     that a presentation be made but that the issue be handled
     administratively, and that the policy be changed if necessary.

15.  TAX CERTIFICATES

     The Board considered whether or not to apply for tax deeds on
     Tax Certificates which will expire on May 24, 1996.  It was
     noted that the County is the holder of 36 1989 Tax
     Certificates which will be cancelled and declared null and
     void by May 24, 1996.

     Commissioner Thaell moved, duly seconded by Commissioner Davis
     and carried 5 - 1 (Commissioner Joanos voted in opposition and
     Commissioner Yordon was not present), to apply for the tax
     deed and direct staff to present an agenda item for
     determination of purchase options for every sale.  County
     Administrator Alam explained that the County will apply for
     the tax deeds and an auction will be held.  If no one buys the
     tax deeds at the auction, then the County will have 90 days to
     purchase.  Commissioner Kio-Green stated that if something
     advantageous comes forward, the County Administrator should
     bring it to the Board's attention.  She also suggested that
     all the delinquent tax deed certificates be brought forward
     (after two years).  The County Administrator will bring the
     issue back as an agenda item.  

16.  QUARTERLY MEETINGS WITH CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS AND JUDICIAL
     OFFICERS

     Chairman Host suggested scheduling quarterly meetings with the 
     Constitutional Officers to discuss matters of mutual concern
     (such as cost saving initiatives, etc.) where each other's
     cooperation and assistance is needed.

     Commissioner Kio-Green moved, duly seconded by Commissioner
     Davis and carried unanimously 6 - 0, (Commissioner Yordon was
     not present), to approve the concept and meeting schedule, and
     authorize the Chairman to send letters of invitation to all
     Constitutional and Judicial Officers. 

     Commissioner Thaell asked how this concept would affect the
     Commission liaisons with constitutional officers.  Chairman
     Host stated that he was not sure how this would affect that
     process, but this was not an attempt to undermine the liaison
     process.

16.  APPOINTMENTS

     a.   Chaires/Capitola Community Center Board of Directors -
          Commissioner Yordon's appointment was continued since he
          was not present.




               b.   Child Care Licensing and Examination Board - Commissioner
          Kio-Green moved, duly seconded by Commissioner Davis and
          carried unanimously, 6 - 0 (Commissioner Yordon was not
          present), to reappoint Mr. Stan Parsons.

     c.   Contractors Licensing and Examination Board -
          Commissioner Yordon's appointment was continued since he
          was not present.  Commissioner Maloy reappointed John
          Salvo.  Chairman Host reappointed Rick Moore. 
          Commissioner Kio-Green appointed Bert Davey.

     d.   Cultural Resources Commission - Commissioner Thaell
          moved, duly seconded by Commissioner Davis and carried 6
-           0 (Commissioner Yordon was not present), to appoint
          Jorges Olaves and Ron Davis.  Commissioner Kio-Green
          suggested that more nominations be provided by the
          Cultural Resources Commission.  The Board concurred.   

     e.   Health and Human Services Board, District 2 -  The Board
          deferred this item.  Commissioner Thaell raised some
          concerns regarding appointments and nominations having to
          be screened by the Nominee Qualifications Review
          Committee and suggested that Mr. Keith Youchock be given
          consideration for appointment.  The Board advised that
          this item would be placed on the agenda for the next
          meeting. 

     f.   Human Services Grant Review Committee -  Commissioner
          Kio-Green continued her appointment until April 9.


     g.   Nominations Qualifications Review Committee, HRS District
          2 - The Board continued this item until April 9.

     h.   Tourist Development Council - Chairman Host recommended
          the appointment of Mickey Bradey to replace Lou Ann
          Jordan and Don Schlinger.  The Board concurred.

     i.   Woodville Community Center Board of Directors -
          Commissioner Kio-Green stated that she thought that there
          were seven members and that each Commissioner makes an
          appointment.  The Board concurred that there be seven
          appointments by each Commissioner and that the issue be
          brought back to the Board.

CITIZENS TO BE HEARD

     Ms. Lila Richardson, 3017 Baron Lane, Crown Ridge Estates,
     appeared and requested the Board's support in changing the
     current age limit of 16 years when children can drop out of
     school and that this matter be taken to the Legislature.

               Ms. Richardson also requested that children be allowed to work
     at age 14 rather than 16.  The Board advised that children
     cannot drop out of school without parental consent, and the
     age limit is established by State Law.  

     Commissioner Joanos moved to adopt a resolution to be sent to
     the Legislature requesting support that the age limit for 
     dropping out of school be changed to age 18.  There was no
     second to the motion, but the Board concurred that the County
     Administrator draft appropriate resolution language to be sent
     to the Legislature.  See attached Resolution R96-07:

DISCUSSION ITEMS BY COMMISSIONERS

COMMISSIONER THAELL
a.   Circulated a workbook that was presented during the Chinese
     Tallow Awareness Day event at Lake Jackson on Saturday (which
     was coordinated by the County Forester and DEP).  Commissioner
     Thaell explained staff is working with local nurseries to
     ensure that they do not sell the Chinese Tallow because of its
     adverse affect on waterbodies (leaves are toxic to fish) and
     advised that some counties in Florida are considering
     ordinances to restrict planting of this tree.  Commissioners
     Kio-Green and Thaell indicated that they would not object to
     considering an ordinance or an ordinance amendment to the
     Environmental Management Act Ordinance. 

b.   Commissioner Thaell reported that he received several calls
     regarding Lake Shore Gardens development on Meridian Road and
     was under the impression that there was action taken by Growth
     Management and Public Works.

     Commissioner Thaell requested clarification on this issue. 
     Mr. Gary Johnson, Department of Growth and Environmental
     Management, appeared and reported that he received an E-Mail
     message which he read indicating the following:  The site was
     muddy, was receiving run-off from off-site, erosion control
     has not been maintained, the contractor is being contacted to
     receive a verbal warning to immediately correct the problem,
     and Public Works has put the project on hold pending drainage
     corrections by the project engineer.  Staff will conduct 
     follow-up on Friday.  

COMMISSIONER DAVIS
a.   Publicly thanked Public Works Director Mike Willett for
     assisting with the structure for the Woodville Community ball
     fields.

b.   Advised that the 46th Southern Provincial Counsel for Kappa
     Alpha will be meeting in Tallahassee and requested a
     Resolution for their community meeting on Thursday.

     The Board concurred that Commissioner Davis deliver the
     resolution.  Commissioner Maloy requested that the Tourist
     Development Council be advised and a copy of the resolution be
     provided to the Director.

CHAIRMAN HOST
a.   Reported that the DOT has increased the speed limit on I-10
     (between Jefferson and Gadsden County) to 70 mph effective
     April 5, 1996.



b.             Requested adoption of a resolution for "Keep Tallahassee-Leon
     County Beautiful" for Keep America Beautiful Month.  The Board
     concurred.

c.   A County staff member will be present for a presentation,
     representing the County, for the St. Marks Trail Association
     for support of the Gopher, Frogs, and Tortoise Trail.

d.   Reminded the Board of the Miccosukee Road closure (between
     Capital Circle and Riggins Road) which will occur on April 2
     through July 31 (120 days).  Chairman Host stated that this
     will disrupt the general traveling public on Centerville Road,
     Capital Circle NE, and Mahan Drive because of traffic
     diversion, and urged the contractor to do everything possible
     to accelerate the process.  Mr. Tony Park, Public Works,
     advised that pamphlets have been mailed out and will be passed
     out on Miccosukee Road.

e.   Chairman Host requested that the Board consider a two-
thirds/two-thirds program to build sidewalks within the urban
     service area of the county for subdivisions that do not have
     sidewalks, and to expand the idea to require subdivisions that
     are built within the urban service area to build sidewalks. 
     The Board concurred.

     There being no further business to come before the Board, the
meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p.m.

                                   APPROVED:                 
                                             Bruce J. Host
                                             Chairman

ATTEST:







                                              
     Clerk of the Circuit Court